智能查验系统助进境散粮高效通关♐《榴莲视频beta版已过期解决办法》并广泛征求修改意见和建议，《榴莲视频beta版已过期解决办法》

　　中新網北京1月19日電(蔣鯉)日本政府即日稱，將於2023年春夏時期開端背海洋排放經過措置的福島第一核電站核汙水。日本罔看國內大眾及周邊國家的幾次反對，狡計將核汙水“一倒了之”，把一件關乎舉世海洋逝世態情形戰公共健康的事當作了自家公務。

　　2011年，福島核電站事變發生後，多量放射性物質保守去氛圍層戰太平洋，對周圍情形構成了易以逆轉的風險，數十萬人誌願退卻該地區。時至今日，行動日本鄰邦之一的韓邦仍已消弭福島海陳禁令。

　　日本以核汙水儲蓄本事即將達到上限為由，正正在2021年4月13日，正式抉擇將福島第一核電站核汙水排進太平洋。疇昔一年多，日本政府戰東京電公司一貫正正在持續鞭策核汙水排海籌算。

　　日本政府辯稱，那些核汙水經多核素措置係統(ALPS)措置後很安然，甚至“可以喝”，這樣的表態無疑正正在玩弄大眾。

　　事實上，經過措置的核汙水仍露有多種放射性物質，核汙水一晨排放進海便出法接管接收，耐久來看，將會給海洋逝世態帶來易以估量的暗藏挾製，畢竟危險人類健康。

　　是以，核汙水排海籌算推出後，遭到日本大眾劇烈反對。日本《朝日新聞》2022年3月公布的問卷查問造訪表示，福島縣、宮城縣戰岩足縣受訪的42個市町村少中，約六成反對東京電公司福島第一核電站核汙水排放進海。日本全國漁業協會連係會也多次申明立場，反對該籌算。

　　日本政府覺得，核汙水排海是最便宜、最省事的打點打算，但此舉卻將周邊國家乃至環球置於核汙染風險中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核汙水會隨著洋流勾當，其影響勢必會超越邦畿，危險周邊國家乃至全數邦際社會的公共福祉戰益處。

　　《韓邦經濟新聞》支文稱，相關鑽研覺得，福島核汙水如果排放進海，約7個月後將到達濟州等韓邦海域，該邦水財富戰旅遊業將承受相等大年夜的損失。

　　德邦北極海洋機構也曾發出警告，若日本將全數核汙水排進海中，不去半年，全數太平洋皆將麵臨下度輻射挾製，包含遠正正在大年夜洋別的一端的好邦。太平洋地區百姓更是對日本該籌算持反對意見。

　　日本行動《連係邦海洋法公約》締約邦，有使命嗬護海洋情形。可是，正正在核汙水排海打算的正當性、核汙水數據的可靠性、淨化拆卸的有效性、情形影響的不必定性等成就上，日本已能做出科學、可信的聲名。

　　邦際簿本能機構技術工作組雖已三次赴日實天考核評估，但借不便日排海打算的安然性給出結論，並且對日本提出諸多澄清要求戰整刊定睹。正正在此景象下，日本仍執意鞭策核汙水排海工程拔擢，那是極不擔負任的步履。

　　太平洋克日本的下水講，日本必須看重各圓合理關懷，正正在與周邊國家等相關益處圓戰邦際簿本能機構充分籌議後，製定合理的核汙水措置打算。日本也要著眼長遠，若隻看眼前，執意將核汙水排放進海，不單其自己，周邊國家乃至環球皆將為之購單，後來果必將會危險數代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.